6 questions investors should ask when evaluating psychedelic biotech companies

As a venture firm that invests in psychedelics, we receive hundreds of pitches every month from founders developing psychedelic therapeutics.

Startups are developing treatments for depression by combining psilocybin with psychotherapy, creating new delivery methods, like dissolving strips and patches, and even formulating compounds that rewire neural circuits without hallucinogenic effects.

Once fringe, underground, illegal or just limited to ceremonial use by Indigenous cultures, psychedelics are going mainstream in medicinal form. Psychedelic medicine is spawning new companies in every part of the healthcare and life sciences ecosystem, including areas within drug discovery, manufacturing, clinics and retreats, telemedicine and other digital therapeutics, as well as consumer packaged goods.

Our fund has invested more than $15 million in companies developing psychedelic therapeutics. We believe psychedelic medicine and progress in digital therapeutics, precision psychiatry and neurotechnology will revolutionize how mental health is treated. Unlike traditional antidepressants and pharmaceuticals, psychedelic medicine has the potential to help people address the root causes of their mental health concerns rather than just symptoms.

A landmark study by Johns Hopkins found that psilocybin treatment for major depression is four times more effective than traditional antidepressants. Other benefits include their ability to promote the development of new neural pathways and increase empathy and openness, which can be beneficial states to facilitate healing.

We believe in a future where psychedelic therapy will be as common as going to the dentist, but the path won’t be easy.

We believe in a future where psychedelic therapy will be as common as going to the dentist. But the path won’t be easy: Many biotech companies working with psychedelic compounds must complete multiyear clinical trials that can cost over $100 million before winning FDA approval, similar to any other biotech company.

So how do we pick which companies to invest in? Here are six key questions we ask when evaluating psychedelic biotech companies:

Does the team have the skills, experience and values to bring a product to market?

The most important factor that can make or break a psychedelic biotech company is its team. Psychedelic medicine is a multidisciplinary domain, so it’s important that the team has a strong foundation in psychedelics, biotechnology, neuropharmacology and/or psychiatry.

That means in biotech, unlike traditional tech companies, it’s rare for a wunderkind first-time founder to start a successful company given the scientific expertise and network required, which may need decades of experience.

It’s also important that the team shares our values when it comes to safety and patient well-being. We especially like teams that have psychedelic experience and are grounded in psychedelic history through academic research, field work or personal exploration. These companies will have a leg up on the competition in areas like product development, culture and recruitment.

China’s Zhiyi Tech raises $100M to help fashion brands predict bestsellers

In China, livestreaming promotion is emerging as a popular way for brands and influencers to reach consumers, challenging the traditional e-commerce model where users browse static pictures, read reviews and place orders. Arising from this trend are tools that help brands better predict what and how to sell through their live commerce stores.

One of the players providing such software is Zhiyi Tech, a four-year-old company based out of Hangzhou, Alibaba’s backyard, and run by two Carnegie Mellon Ph.D.s specializing in artificial intelligence. The company said it recently raised close to $100 million from three rounds of funding led respectively by GL Ventures — Hillhouse Capital’s early-stage arm, Zoo Capital, Xianghe Capital and CE Innovation Capital.

Other investors from the round included existing shareholders Legend Capital and Yonghua Capital. The proceeds add to the “tens of millions of dollars” Zhiyi raised from a Series A round in 2018.

Zhiyi works by scouring the internet for styles, including those from Instagram influencers and fashion shows, and turning them into actionable insight for designers, such as which color, material or pattern is trending. On top of that, it analyzes apparel sales on e-commerce sites like Alibaba’s Taobao marketplace and Douyin, TikTok’s Chinese version, and breaks down the bestsellers. Finally, it has an ecosystem of suppliers that retailers can tap. In other words, Zhiyi is building a one-stop solution for brands and influencers making money off live commerce. With the new funding, Zhiyi plans to hire more staff and conduct product R&D.

Zhiyi is mostly serving brands in China at the moment, but the change in the fashion industry it represents has a wider global reach. The success of global fast fashion e-commerce upstart Shein has helped populate the idea of “on-demand fashion”: Brands design and manufacture clothes based on real-time consumer sentiment and fashion trends rather than trying to build a supply chain that can sell. A raft of online fashion startups, such as Cider, has been working to replicate Shein’s success by leveraging big data to forecast consumer behavior worldwide and tapping China’s rich supply chain resources.

Axie Infinity creator raises $150M round to compensate victims of ~$625M Ronin hack

Vietnamese gaming studio Sky Mavis announced that it has raised $150 million in funding led by crypto exchange Binance to help reimburse users who lost funds during a ~$625 million hack of its play-to-earn game Axie Infinity, which was the largest crypto heist to date. Animoca Brands, a16z, Dialectic, Paradigm and Accel, also participated in the raise, according to Sky Mavis.

The new funds will be combined with cash from Sky Mavis’ balance sheet to reimburse all users who lost money in the attack on Ronin, an Ethereum-based sidechain supporting the game. The company plans to reopen the Ronin bridge after a security upgrade and audits, which it says could take several weeks. In the meantime, Binance is providing liquidity for Ronin users by allowing them to withdraw and deposit ETH freely.

Binance is one of the only major crypto exchanges that directly integrates with the Ronin network and allows users to move funds from its platform to a Ronin wallet address. Today’s announcement appears to mark the first time Binance has invested directly in Sky Mavis.

Sky Mavis also addressed the cause of the attack in its announcement, attributing the breach to the “small validator set which made it much easier to compromise the network.” The hacker was able to obtain five of the nine keys used to validate the network, enough to enable them to withdraw tokens from the Ronin bridge into an external wallet. The company said it plans to increase the validator group from five to 21 validators in the next three months to safeguard against future risks.

The company generated $1.3 billion in revenue in the 12 months through February, and Axie Infinity itself has a “community treasury” worth $1.6 billion, Bloomberg reported last week. In the hack, 56,000 ETH tokens (worth around $185,000,000 USD at today’s prices) from the treasury were compromised — funds Sky Mavis say will remain uncollateralized as the company works with law enforcement to recover them. The Axie community would have needed to host a vote to approve liquidating any of the treasury funds to reimburse users, which could explain why Sky Mavis chose to raise external cash and use its own balance sheet instead.

It’s incredibly difficult for funds to be recovered after a crypto hack, let alone returned to users directly. The majority of the funds are still in the hacker’s wallet, though the hacker appeared to move some 2,000 ETH out of the wallet to privacy tool Tornado Cash, which allows users to mask their wallet address while withdrawing funds.

Axie Infinity has 2.2 million monthly active players, and according to the company, is the most-played NFT game of all time. Sky Mavis last raised a $152 million Series B in October 2021, led by a16z alongside other venture firms including Paradigm and Accel, all three of which participated in today’s fundraise.

Axie Infinity creator raises $150M round to compensate victims of ~$625M Ronin hack

Vietnamese gaming studio Sky Mavis announced that it has raised $150 million in funding led by crypto exchange Binance to help reimburse users who lost funds during a ~$625 million hack of its play-to-earn game Axie Infinity, which was the largest crypto heist to date. Animoca Brands, a16z, Dialectic, Paradigm and Accel, also participated in the raise, according to Sky Mavis.

The new funds will be combined with cash from Sky Mavis’ balance sheet to reimburse all users who lost money in the attack on Ronin, an Ethereum-based sidechain supporting the game. The company plans to reopen the Ronin bridge after a security upgrade and audits, which it says could take several weeks. In the meantime, Binance is providing liquidity for Ronin users by allowing them to withdraw and deposit ETH freely.

Binance is one of the only major crypto exchanges that directly integrates with the Ronin network and allows users to move funds from its platform to a Ronin wallet address. Today’s announcement appears to mark the first time Binance has invested directly in Sky Mavis.

Sky Mavis also addressed the cause of the attack in its announcement, attributing the breach to the “small validator set which made it much easier to compromise the network.” The hacker was able to obtain five of the nine keys used to validate the network, enough to enable them to withdraw tokens from the Ronin bridge into an external wallet. The company said it plans to increase the validator group from five to 21 validators in the next three months to safeguard against future risks.

The company generated $1.3 billion in revenue in the 12 months through February, and Axie Infinity itself has a “community treasury” worth $1.6 billion, Bloomberg reported last week. In the hack, 56,000 ETH tokens (worth around $185,000,000 USD at today’s prices) from the treasury were compromised — funds Sky Mavis say will remain uncollateralized as the company works with law enforcement to recover them. The Axie community would have needed to host a vote to approve liquidating any of the treasury funds to reimburse users, which could explain why Sky Mavis chose to raise external cash and use its own balance sheet instead.

It’s incredibly difficult for funds to be recovered after a crypto hack, let alone returned to users directly. The majority of the funds are still in the hacker’s wallet, though the hacker appeared to move some 2,000 ETH out of the wallet to privacy tool Tornado Cash, which allows users to mask their wallet address while withdrawing funds.

Axie Infinity has 2.2 million monthly active players, and according to the company, is the most-played NFT game of all time. Sky Mavis last raised a $152 million Series B in October 2021, led by a16z alongside other venture firms including Paradigm and Accel, all three of which participated in today’s fundraise.

SeeMetrics scores $6M seed to surface key security metrics for CISOs

Every CISO (chief information security officer) is tasked with keeping the company safe and secure, but it isn’t always easy to see what’s happening on the ground inside a large organization with a multitude of tools crossing many different departments. While there are many data visualization tools on the market, they usually require someone with expertise to pull the data together into a dashboard.

SeeMetrics saw this workflow as problematic, leaving the CISOs to try and communicate to the data team what they needed, especially when those needs were probably changing based on whatever threats they were facing at any given time. The startup saw an opportunity to take the middle person out of the process, and let CISOs figure out what data was important to them and the requirements of their particular organizations.

Shirley Salzman, co-founder and CEO at SeeMetrics, says that her company is part of an emerging category that is looking at security and performance management. In other words, she is trying to arm CISOs with the data they need to understand their security posture across a number of dimensions.

“Today’s CISO organizations have dozens, if not hundreds of different tactical tools that are guiding the organization. But it’s a very cumbersome process for strategy people working with the [security] operations team to surface the data for operations,” she said. In fact, it is often done manually in a tool not purpose-built for security.

SeeMetrics wanted to put the data directly in the hands of the CISO, or at least the CISO team, and make that manual process more automated. “So the performance management platform is here to allow security leadership to understand what’s going on across their operations, tweaking the operational information to something that will help them as a decision maker.”

In practice as an example, that could mean understanding what percentage of data in the organization is encrypted. “This is something that every security leader needs to know for specific business units or at the corporate level. Am I 80%, 40% encrypted? I bought all those encryption tools. Are they actually doing what they need to do?”

SeeMetrics interface with data designed for CISOs.

Image Credits: SeeMetrics

Salzman says this data could be for risk management purposes or for data in a security audit, but it’s always available once you connect it to the software. For now, the company is in early days working with design customers to help shape the product, and hopes to release it to the market later this year.

While SeeMetrics is pre-revenue at this point, it has 15 employees. As she hires more, as a female founder, Salzman is acutely aware that women are poorly represented when it comes to founders. In fact, last year one of her seed investors, Work-Bench released a report that just 1.9% of enterprise startups founders are women.

As she builds her company, she wants to build diversity into the core values of the organization. “I can tell you that it was an upfront discussion with my co-founders Mike (Admon) and Shay (Haluba) that we are putting it as a benchmark for ourselves to be a diverse company,” she said. They are working with recruiters to help and she has even directly recruited on LinkedIn herself. At this point, the company has 30% women, but she wants to improve upon that number as the company grows.

The company announced a $6 million seed round today led by Work-Bench, 8VC, AGP, Essence VC, K5 Global and Verissimo along with unnamed industry angels.

SeeMetrics scores $6M seed to surface key security metrics for CISOs

Every CISO (chief information security officer) is tasked with keeping the company safe and secure, but it isn’t always easy to see what’s happening on the ground inside a large organization with a multitude of tools crossing many different departments. While there are many data visualization tools on the market, they usually require someone with expertise to pull the data together into a dashboard.

SeeMetrics saw this workflow as problematic, leaving the CISOs to try and communicate to the data team what they needed, especially when those needs were probably changing based on whatever threats they were facing at any given time. The startup saw an opportunity to take the middle person out of the process, and let CISOs figure out what data was important to them and the requirements of their particular organizations.

Shirley Salzman, co-founder and CEO at SeeMetrics, says that her company is part of an emerging category that is looking at security and performance management. In other words, she is trying to arm CISOs with the data they need to understand their security posture across a number of dimensions.

“Today’s CISO organizations have dozens, if not hundreds of different tactical tools that are guiding the organization. But it’s a very cumbersome process for strategy people working with the [security] operations team to surface the data for operations,” she said. In fact, it is often done manually in a tool not purpose-built for security.

SeeMetrics wanted to put the data directly in the hands of the CISO, or at least the CISO team, and make that manual process more automated. “So the performance management platform is here to allow security leadership to understand what’s going on across their operations, tweaking the operational information to something that will help them as a decision maker.”

In practice as an example, that could mean understanding what percentage of data in the organization is encrypted. “This is something that every security leader needs to know for specific business units or at the corporate level. Am I 80%, 40% encrypted? I bought all those encryption tools. Are they actually doing what they need to do?”

SeeMetrics interface with data designed for CISOs.

Image Credits: SeeMetrics

Salzman says this data could be for risk management purposes or for data in a security audit, but it’s always available once you connect it to the software. For now, the company is in early days working with design customers to help shape the product, and hopes to release it to the market later this year.

While SeeMetrics is pre-revenue at this point, it has 15 employees. As she hires more, as a female founder, Salzman is acutely aware that women are poorly represented when it comes to founders. In fact, last year one of her seed investors, Work-Bench released a report that just 1.9% of enterprise startups founders are women.

As she builds her company, she wants to build diversity into the core values of the organization. “I can tell you that it was an upfront discussion with my co-founders Mike (Admon) and Shay (Haluba) that we are putting it as a benchmark for ourselves to be a diverse company,” she said. They are working with recruiters to help and she has even directly recruited on LinkedIn herself. At this point, the company has 30% women, but she wants to improve upon that number as the company grows.

The company announced a $6 million seed round today led by Work-Bench, 8VC, AGP, Essence VC, K5 Global and Verissimo along with unnamed industry angels.

Cottage raises $15M to make it easier for homeowners to build custom ADUs

An easing of laws around the construction of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) around the U.S. has opened up opportunities for companies that build such structures.

Cottage is one such company. The San Francisco-based startup has developed software and a marketplace that connects homeowners that want an ADU with contractors who can build them. And it just closed on $15 million in a Series A funding round led by proptech-focused VC firm Fifth Wall to grow its business.

Alex Czarnecki, founder & CEO of Cottage, was inspired to start the company after growing up in the Bay Area, where housing prices are among the highest in the country. As longtime Bay Area residents, his parents sought additional income upon his father’s retirement. So they looked into building an ADU that they could rent out to local students. The practice is not uncommon. Many Bay Area residents are turning to ADUs as rentals to bring in extra income since laws in the state have relaxed.

“What followed was an over a year long nightmare and process around the feasibility, permitting and construction,” Czarnecki recalls. “The complexity of the process, the opaque pricing and the difficulty of finding the right contractor was the inspiration for Cottage.”

Czarnecki emphasizes that Cottage is not a prefab homebuilder. Rather, he describes the startup as a SaaS-enabled marketplace for residential construction, starting with custom ADUs. By digitizing the design-build process, Cottage says it saves homeowners months of time and thousands of dollars, while providing its contractors a “predictable pipeline of projects and time-saving tools.” 

“We match contractors to residential homeowners and provide them with software tools to make them more efficient,” he told TechCrunch. “There are better outcomes all around.”

For now, Cottage partners with small to medium-sized local, “qualified” residential general contractors. Since it helps homeowners with architecture, design and permitting, the projects are essentially ready to go for contractors, the company says.

Czarnecki began thinking about the business in late 2019 and launched in late Spring of 2020. So far, it has completed “hundreds” of projects and expanded from the Bay Area to Los Angeles, where the company achieved market level profitability in four months’ time, according to Czarnecki. The startup plans to soon launch in San Diego as well and then another five to six markets over the next year.

“These are relatively small homes but they have a pretty interesting impact on the housing supply,” Czarnecki said.

Cottage solely advertises to homeowners and charges them a fixed fee to handle the whole pre-construction process.  

“We see this as money they would have spent working with an architect or project manager,” Czarnecki said. “And, charging fixed fees is nontraditional in the industry.”

The arrangement works out well for contractors, he believes, in that Cottage comes to them with projects so that they have “a 4x higher win rate than typical projects they source themselves.”

“They are vetted, designed and permitted,” Czarnecki added. “They get in at a stage where they have a longer lead time into the visibility of their pipeline so that they can take on new projects.”

In the future, he sees opportunities to monetize the other side of the marketplace, sourcing general contractors with projects and providing them with software tools and then taking a percentage of the transaction volume. 

“Plenty of lead gen services are charging 5 to 8% for project sourcing but they’re not getting as much value as they would with us,” Czarnecki added. “Eventually, we will be their operating system.”

The founder touts an asset light business that doesn’t require a factory or warehouse, like some ADU providers.

“We’re connecting homeowners to fragmented providers,” he said.

1Sharpe Ventures, DivcoWest and existing investors Susa Ventures and Base10 Partners also participated in the financing, which brings the company’s total raised to just over $20 million.

The company plans to use the new capital in part to increase its headcount from 30 to 50 or 60 by year’s end. It will also put the money toward building functionality so that its offering is “useful to GCs for all types of projects and all methods of sourcing, not just our sourcing.” 

Down the line, Czarnecki said Cottage could move into other types of projects while capitalizing on the fact that “lots of markets are changing ADU laws.” 

The California legislature changed laws in 2017 to make it easier to build Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). Then on January 1, 2020, the state of California made it dramatically easier to add extra housing units to single-family home sites. Cities and local agencies have to quickly approve or deny ADU projects within 60 days of receiving a permit application. The state also now prevents cities from imposing minimum lot size requirements, maximum ADU dimensions or off-street parking requirements. 

“We’re not pigeonholing ourselves to just doing ADUs,” Czarnecki said. “The competencies around building homeowner distribution, and building a network of suppliers and contractors that can fulfill on these projects that could be applicable to other types of renovation or construction.”

 Dan Wenhold, partner at Fifth Wall, believes Cottage is offering a new, more efficient way for homeowners to design and build ADUs.

“Cottage’s entire model is incredibly unique. From the ability to design a custom ADU online to having a curated group of contractors available to complete the project is beneficial to both homeowners and builders,” said Wenhold, who is joining the company’s board as part of his firm’s investment. “Homeowners enjoy a streamlined building process while contractors have access to a pipeline of projects.”

Notably, Fifth Wall is also an investor in another proptech, Homebound, which in February raised $75 million in a Series C funding round led by Khosla Ventures toward its efforts to help address housing inventory shortages with its technology. That company’s self-described mission is to serve as a “next gen” homebuilder to make it possible “for anyone, anywhere to build a home.”

“Both companies are working to advance the technology of the Built World and dedication to innovation is exactly what we look for in our investments,” Wenhold said.

Over the past year, there have been a number of other startups focused on the ADU construction space that have also raised venture dollars.

Last July, TechCrunch reported that startup Abodu had raised $20 million in a Series A funding round led by Norwest Venture Partners. Redwood City, California-based Abodu, which builds prefabricated ADUs, was founded in 2018 to serve as a “one-stop shop” for building an ADU, or as some describe it, a home in a backyard. It too says it helps homeowners obtain permits.

Also last July, TechCrunch covered Mighty Buildings, an Oakland-based startup building ADUs and other housing that raised $22 million. That company said it is focused on innovation in construction with a 3D-printed method. And Villa, a startup founded out of Atomic’s venture studio, raised $15 million last August.

Meanwhile, Austin-based Kiro Action – a recent SXSW pitch winner – is a bootstrapped startup that is set to deliver “hundreds” of its structures, which the company describes as “modern refuge, crisis response housing & consumer dwellings deployed in hours.”

Cottage raises $15M to make it easier for homeowners to build custom ADUs

An easing of laws around the construction of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) around the U.S. has opened up opportunities for companies that build such structures.

Cottage is one such company. The San Francisco-based startup has developed software and a marketplace that connects homeowners that want an ADU with contractors who can build them. And it just closed on $15 million in a Series A funding round led by proptech-focused VC firm Fifth Wall to grow its business.

Alex Czarnecki, founder & CEO of Cottage, was inspired to start the company after growing up in the Bay Area, where housing prices are among the highest in the country. As longtime Bay Area residents, his parents sought additional income upon his father’s retirement. So they looked into building an ADU that they could rent out to local students. The practice is not uncommon. Many Bay Area residents are turning to ADUs as rentals to bring in extra income since laws in the state have relaxed.

“What followed was an over a year long nightmare and process around the feasibility, permitting and construction,” Czarnecki recalls. “The complexity of the process, the opaque pricing and the difficulty of finding the right contractor was the inspiration for Cottage.”

Czarnecki emphasizes that Cottage is not a prefab homebuilder. Rather, he describes the startup as a SaaS-enabled marketplace for residential construction, starting with custom ADUs. By digitizing the design-build process, Cottage says it saves homeowners months of time and thousands of dollars, while providing its contractors a “predictable pipeline of projects and time-saving tools.” 

“We match contractors to residential homeowners and provide them with software tools to make them more efficient,” he told TechCrunch. “There are better outcomes all around.”

For now, Cottage partners with small to medium-sized local, “qualified” residential general contractors. Since it helps homeowners with architecture, design and permitting, the projects are essentially ready to go for contractors, the company says.

Czarnecki began thinking about the business in late 2019 and launched in late Spring of 2020. So far, it has completed “hundreds” of projects and expanded from the Bay Area to Los Angeles, where the company achieved market level profitability in four months’ time, according to Czarnecki. The startup plans to soon launch in San Diego as well and then another five to six markets over the next year.

“These are relatively small homes but they have a pretty interesting impact on the housing supply,” Czarnecki said.

Cottage solely advertises to homeowners and charges them a fixed fee to handle the whole pre-construction process.  

“We see this as money they would have spent working with an architect or project manager,” Czarnecki said. “And, charging fixed fees is nontraditional in the industry.”

The arrangement works out well for contractors, he believes, in that Cottage comes to them with projects so that they have “a 4x higher win rate than typical projects they source themselves.”

“They are vetted, designed and permitted,” Czarnecki added. “They get in at a stage where they have a longer lead time into the visibility of their pipeline so that they can take on new projects.”

In the future, he sees opportunities to monetize the other side of the marketplace, sourcing general contractors with projects and providing them with software tools and then taking a percentage of the transaction volume. 

“Plenty of lead gen services are charging 5 to 8% for project sourcing but they’re not getting as much value as they would with us,” Czarnecki added. “Eventually, we will be their operating system.”

The founder touts an asset light business that doesn’t require a factory or warehouse, like some ADU providers.

“We’re connecting homeowners to fragmented providers,” he said.

1Sharpe Ventures, DivcoWest and existing investors Susa Ventures and Base10 Partners also participated in the financing, which brings the company’s total raised to just over $20 million.

The company plans to use the new capital in part to increase its headcount from 30 to 50 or 60 by year’s end. It will also put the money toward building functionality so that its offering is “useful to GCs for all types of projects and all methods of sourcing, not just our sourcing.” 

Down the line, Czarnecki said Cottage could move into other types of projects while capitalizing on the fact that “lots of markets are changing ADU laws.” 

The California legislature changed laws in 2017 to make it easier to build Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). Then on January 1, 2020, the state of California made it dramatically easier to add extra housing units to single-family home sites. Cities and local agencies have to quickly approve or deny ADU projects within 60 days of receiving a permit application. The state also now prevents cities from imposing minimum lot size requirements, maximum ADU dimensions or off-street parking requirements. 

“We’re not pigeonholing ourselves to just doing ADUs,” Czarnecki said. “The competencies around building homeowner distribution, and building a network of suppliers and contractors that can fulfill on these projects that could be applicable to other types of renovation or construction.”

 Dan Wenhold, partner at Fifth Wall, believes Cottage is offering a new, more efficient way for homeowners to design and build ADUs.

“Cottage’s entire model is incredibly unique. From the ability to design a custom ADU online to having a curated group of contractors available to complete the project is beneficial to both homeowners and builders,” said Wenhold, who is joining the company’s board as part of his firm’s investment. “Homeowners enjoy a streamlined building process while contractors have access to a pipeline of projects.”

Notably, Fifth Wall is also an investor in another proptech, Homebound, which in February raised $75 million in a Series C funding round led by Khosla Ventures toward its efforts to help address housing inventory shortages with its technology. That company’s self-described mission is to serve as a “next gen” homebuilder to make it possible “for anyone, anywhere to build a home.”

“Both companies are working to advance the technology of the Built World and dedication to innovation is exactly what we look for in our investments,” Wenhold said.

Over the past year, there have been a number of other startups focused on the ADU construction space that have also raised venture dollars.

Last July, TechCrunch reported that startup Abodu had raised $20 million in a Series A funding round led by Norwest Venture Partners. Redwood City, California-based Abodu, which builds prefabricated ADUs, was founded in 2018 to serve as a “one-stop shop” for building an ADU, or as some describe it, a home in a backyard. It too says it helps homeowners obtain permits.

Also last July, TechCrunch covered Mighty Buildings, an Oakland-based startup building ADUs and other housing that raised $22 million. That company said it is focused on innovation in construction with a 3D-printed method. And Villa, a startup founded out of Atomic’s venture studio, raised $15 million last August.

Meanwhile, Austin-based Kiro Action – a recent SXSW pitch winner – is a bootstrapped startup that is set to deliver “hundreds” of its structures, which the company describes as “modern refuge, crisis response housing & consumer dwellings deployed in hours.”

SmartHop raises $30M to boost trucking fintech products

SmartHop, a startup that uses AI to help interstate truckers make their routes more efficient and lucrative by removing administrative headaches, just raised a $30 million Series B financing round, bringing the company’s total funding to $46 million following a $12 million Series A last year.

The startup’s main offering is its smart dispatch service, which recommends loads to truck drivers that optimize profits and travel time based on their truck capacity, what cities they’re driving through and other details. With the fresh capital, SmartHop aims to focus more on its fintech products, like the company’s fuel card program that offers fuel discounts and other perks, or SmartHop’s insurance offerings.

“The prices of fuel and insurance premiums within the trucking industry have been rapidly rising and impacting the bottom lines of small truckers (our core market) disproportionately and SmartHop just conducted a survey that found fuel and insurance costs are their top two concerns,” Guillermo Garcia, co-founder and CEO of SmartHop, told TechCrunch.

With fuel prices at such a steep premium today, small trucking companies have less power to negotiate fuel rates ahead of time and are therefore subject to the current high rates for diesel, according to the company. SmartHop’s access to a large network of brokers, freight marketplaces and partners can give smaller companies access to better rates.

Other companies, like CloudTrucks, are also aiming to alleviate pain points for smaller trucking companies, which are majority owner-operators, through a variety of dispatch and financial products.

SmartHop will also use the funds to scale its platform generally and grow out its team, according to a statement from the company.

Trucking is far from an easy job. It tasks the bodies and minds of truckers as they spend hours in social isolation and physical discomfort. Not to mention the stress associated with searching through websites and apps of thousands of brokers to make deals, plan routes and try to have some semblance of control over their income.

Last year, trucking companies in the United States faced a record deficit of 80,000 drivers, according to the American Trucking Associations, a fact that some argue has contributed to supply chain disruption. At a time when autonomous freight startups are getting increasingly larger amounts of funding from investors, SmartHop’s latest round shows that making the job easier for the average trucker today is the real priority.

That doesn’t mean SmartHop’s business model isn’t future-proof. While we’re nowhere near close to autonomous trucks taking over our highways, SmartHop’s service is as relevant for trucking companies operated manually as it is for those that decide to manage autonomous trucks, Garcia said.

Sozo Ventures led SmartHop’s Series B, and existing investors like Union Square Ventures, RyderVentures, Greycroft, Equal Ventures, Las Olas VC and The Fund also participated alongside a range of angels from the logistics and trucking industry.

Austin emerges as a city of unicorns and tech giants

Austin made headlines in 2021 for being “the place” for startup founders and venture capitalists alike to set up shop. That’s why TechCrunch has chosen to shine a spotlight on the city with a special episode of TechCrunch Live centered on the growing startup scene in Austin, Texas.

As Austin’s skyline expands, the city continues to solidify its standing as a tech hub. And the numbers are there to back it up.

VCs invested over $5.5 billion across 412 deals in 2021, more than double the amount of capital invested in 2020, according to PitchBook data. Rounds are getting larger, too, signaling a further maturing of the market: All of the top 10 deals for Austin in 2021 amounted to $100 million or more.

Today, Austin is more than just the capital of Texas. It’s a city of unicorns and tech giants.


Attend TechCrunch Live’s City Spotlight: Austin special event! Register here. It’s free.

TechCrunch Live is a free weekly event featuring investors, founders, and startups with the goal of helping entrepreneurs build better venture-backed businesses.


Several companies surpassed a $1 billion valuation in 2021, including The Zebra, Firefly Aerospace, Abrigo, ZenBusiness and Iodine Software. SparkCognition achieved unicorn status earlier this year while ICON recently raised $185 million in a Tiger Global-led round that valued it at “nearly $2 billion.” In 2020, Tesla settled into the so-called Silicon Hills district and Oracle moved its headquarters from Silicon Valley. Austin is also home to secondary offices of many of the largest tech companies in the world, including Google, Apple, Oracle, Amazon, Facebook and SpaceX.

Venture capitalists from both coasts are also increasingly drawn to the city. A number of investors now call Austin home after relocating from the Bay Area and New York City. They include Jim Breyer of Breyer Capital and Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale, who said last year he was moving his venture capital firm, 8VC, from Silicon Valley to the city, and Geoff Lewis, founder and managing partner of Bedrock Capital.

Austin wasn’t an overnight success. For years it was known primarily for its software scene — in addition to being the live music capital of the world. But today, new growing sectors include crypto/web3, real estate tech, CPG and insurance technology. As in other maturing markets, companies that have seen success in the past are now spawning a new generation of entrepreneurs as well as attracting others from various locales.

Drawn to the laid-back lifestyle and lower cost of living — relatively speaking — nearly 185 people are moving to Austin on a daily basis. Many of those people work in the tech industry, and many are moving from California.

The Texas capital is home to more capital

Bullish investors have more money than ever to deploy. In 2022 alone, so far, two Austin-based venture firms have announced significant raises in the city — the most recent being Next Coast Ventures. That firm, founded in 2016, announced on March 29, 2022 that it closed $310 million in capital across three funds. Earlier in the month, S3 Ventures raised $250 million for its Fund VII, touting itself as “the largest venture capital fund focused on Texas-based startups.” S3 Ventures founder and managing director Brian Smith notes that when he started the firm in 2005, venture capital in Texas was finally starting to recover from the dot.com bust. At that time, most VC activity was dominated by the now-defunct Austin Ventures and Sevin Rosen Funds.

“Fast forward a few more years, and both AV and SRF had started to wind down. A small crop of mostly sub-$100 million funds appeared, several founded by former AV GPs,” Smith recalls. “Jump to today and those new Texas-focused firms, including ours, have raised multiple funds with the latest ones well over $200 million. Additionally, we have seen several national firms move their HQs or a regional team here. While they are not primarily focused on Texas, they are starting to invest locally, as well.”

This means, he adds, that founders have a broader set of choices for capital partners.

Notably, S3’s investment thesis is focused on Texas. As such, the vast majority of the investments will be in companies headquartered, or with a sizable presence, in the state. It makes initial investments in companies at the seed, Series A and Series B stage and can invest $20 million-plus over the life of a company.

Chris Shonk, co-founder and managing director of ATX Ventures, said his firm is unique in that “everyone” there is both technical and has operating experience.

“ATX will be the first midcontinent VC to have top decile performance two funds in a row,” he told TechCrunch. “It is a true reflection of the vibrancy in the Texas ecosystem and having an operator approach at early-stage VC.”

Shonk has also witnessed the change in the dynamics in the city’s startup scene as it has matured over the years.

“Historically Austin over-indexed on founder and C-suite talent but under-indexed on experienced junior talent who had worked at large tech companies and venture-backed unicorns,” he said. “That has now changed and Austin has an ample market of CXO-executive, VP and junior talent who have VC-backed experience.”

Mike Smerklo moved to Austin from Silicon Valley in 2016 to start Next Coast Ventures with Tom Ball.

“I had spent over 17 years working in the Valley as an entrepreneur and loved every minute of it.  However, I felt that a lot — but not all — of what made the Valley so amazing was replicable,” he told TechCrunch. “ … What really convinced me to move here and start Next Coast was the evidence of several key factors that make a great startup ecosystem —  a strong entrepreneurial culture, great university systems, successful technology companies and an amazing place to live — exist in Austin. All that was needed was more capital to support it.”

Morgan Flager, managing partner of Silverton Partners — one of the state’s most active investors — believes that Austin has finally gotten respect “as a legitimate top tech ecosystem.”

Sixteen years ago, he said, people questioned his move from Silicon Valley to Austin to join Silverton Partners.

“LPs asked me if we, or anyone else, could build a top-tier VC firm here and doubted if Austin could produce billion-dollar companies with any regularity. Entrepreneurs wondered if there was enough capital and talent in Austin, and later-stage investors questioned how much time they should spend in Texas,” Flager recalls. “Now, those questions have largely been answered and been replaced by different, larger questions — like will Austin ever surpass Silicon Valley? In short, we’ve gone from aspiring to be a market that matters to being the hottest tech city in the country.”

Meanwhile, the area has long had a strong base of angel investors funding companies at the very early stage. The Central Texas Angel Network boasts over 110 members, and its website says that its members have pumped $120 million into nearly 200 startups since its 2006 inception.

Marc Nathan, who publishes the weekly Texas-Squared Startup Newsletter, points to a robust angel community that includes serial entrepreneur and data.world CEO and co-founder Brett Hurt, Andrea Kalmans of Lontra Ventures and Justin Siegel, among many others.

Says Shonk:

The angel scene in Austin has always been vibrant. It has recently been amplified by the number of newly established family offices — largely from the real estate, energy and financial services boom — looking to test their skills at making direct investments. Also a number of coastal funds have deployed scouts to help address Bay Area talent flight to Texas so they now have lines in the water as well.

Comparisons to Silicon Valley

Speaking of Silicon Valley, nearly everyone working in tech in Austin is growing weary of hearing about comparisons to it. The overarching belief is that Austin is its own, unique market and that it will not, and should not, be a carbon copy of Silicon Valley.

Having said that, there are also many commonalities between the two — culturally and aesthetically. Both have lots of green and rolling hills. Both boast outdoor lifestyles and a physically active population. And, of course, both are home to innovation, from universities, startups and Big Tech alike.

Like Silicon Valley, Austin is seeing reinvestments from successful founders. Brett Hurt is an example of a successful founder who continues to help the city’s startup scene flourish by also acting as an active angel investor.

With four exits and over 120 angel investments under his belt, Hurt is vocal about his passion for angel investing, telling TechCrunch: “It was not all that long ago that entrepreneurs in Austin often had to strongly consider picking up and moving to Silicon Valley to successfully court venture capital and angel investors — but a lot has changed in the past few years. In fact, in many cases, we’re even seeing the opposite happen. Today, Austin’s angel investing space is incredibly robust.”

In fact, Hurt’s family office, Hurt Family Investments, was one of the first investors in 77 Austin-based startups, including several unicorns such as Everly Health and ZenBusiness.

“We are always looking for new opportunities, especially in SaaS, to help continue the momentum in our exciting local ecosystem,” he added.

Former Bay Area resident Smerklo believes that Silicon Valley will remain the center of technological innovation for “a long time.”

“I don’t try to compare Silicon Valley with any other region — Austin included,” he said. “Doing so is a bit like trying to compare New York City with Hong Kong. They are different and that is okay. I think the better view is that the global nature of technology supports several great geographic pockets where innovation and entrepreneurship can flourish.”

Flager grew up in Silicon Valley and acknowledges that the two have some similarities.

“The growth and energy in Austin feels like Silicon Valley in the ‘90s,” he said. “The diversity of talented people moving here is also reminiscent of the Valley.”

But, in his view, the two have notable differences. For one, state and local governments in Texas are focused on pro-business policies, Flager said, while California has been criticized for not being a business-friendly environment. Indeed, the lack of state income tax in Texas and a willingness on the part of government officials to offer generous incentives have been a draw for many companies.

Culturally, Flager believes that overall, attitudes differ as well. Austin is often described as a tech community where founders support each other rather than compete. Techstars Austin Managing Director Amos Schwartzfarb agrees. “I think one of our biggest strengths is what a wonderfully collaborative city Austin is,” he told TechCrunch. “It’s very unique in how everyone really wants and helps everyone around them be successful.”

In Austin, for example, you will still see cheers and enthusiasm for funding rounds that would not elicit more than a yawn in Silicon Valley.

“It’s a political climate where freedom of thought is rewarded and everyone can feel welcome,” Flager added. “We have to remember what got us to this point and that’s humility and kindness, not pretense … Somewhere along the way, Silicon Valley seemed to let some of these things slip away. Perhaps some people there thought it was too big and important to stumble or regress — I guess we’ll see. I hope Austin never forgets what got us here.”

Schwartzfarb also tires of the comparisons, noting that people outside the city are “constantly” comparing Austin to Silicon Valley. But here in the city? Not so much.

“As a city, community and ecosystem, we do not make that comparison. We are uniquely our own thing on our own path and I think when others make that comparison it creates an incorrect mental image of what Austin is,” he told TechCrunch. “The valley is unique and nothing like it has or will ever exist again. And similarly, in a very different way, Austin is unique, nothing is like us and nothing has or will ever exist again quite like us.”

Lots of growth, little diversity

The massive growth Austin has seen has brought some significant challenges as well. The city’s infrastructure has struggled to accommodate the influx of people and that is evidenced by the widespread traffic jams. Also, folks moving to town and buying up houses in cash have driven median housing prices up by over 40% in 2021 alone.

This means that many people and families are being priced out of the city and having to move out to surrounding areas, such as Round Rock, Cedar Park, Leander, San Marcos and Buda. The lack of affordable housing has also contributed to the dramatic increase in homelessness.

Still, the median price of a home in the Austin metro area of just under $500,000 remains significantly lower than the current $1.4 million median home price in San Jose, California, for example.

While Next Coast’s Smerklo raves about many things about Austin, from its engineering talent to angel networks to music and breakfast tacos, he also acknowledges that there are weaknesses around growth management and infrastructure.

“The infrastructure is the real challenge as the city has historically not supported investments to match the growth,” he said. “There are several projects underway that will help, but we need to do more to make this an affordable, enjoyable and easy urban environment that works for everyone.”

Other situations that have come up also mirror those that plague San Francisco. Decades ago, Austin was known more for its laid-back vibe and charm that inspired the “Keep Austin Weird” slogan. These days, many of the small businesses that gave us that charm have had to shut down due to rising property taxes or rents and are being replaced by shinier, often upscale and cookie-cutter establishments.

But perhaps the biggest, and most enduring, challenge the city faces is its lack of diversity. Austin is known as the most progressive city in Texas, but some argue that progressiveness is not always consistent and depending on the issue, it can be as backward as some other parts of the state. The city may claim to be welcoming, yet the percentage of Black residents, for example, has steadily decreased over time to an estimated 7% in 2020. Many of Austin’s neighborhoods resemble those seen in Silicon Valley with largely white and Asian residents and far fewer Hispanic and Black people.

S3 Ventures’ Eric Engineer believes that Austin’s greatest strength lies in that it is a place people of all types want to live. And many of those people, he says, are drawn to the city’s “welcoming, meritocratic and free-thinking culture.” As mentioned above, still others are attracted to the business-friendly environment and attractive tech jobs.

“At the same time, Austin has real, but surmountable, challenges related to cost of living, transportation, homelessness and diversity,” he told TechCrunch, “which have the attention of our leaders and voters — with several key investments already underway.”

For example, while nearby Houston has a bad rep for being an unattractive, sprawling city with heavy traffic, it boasts the most ethnically diverse population in the nation and has for several years.

Engineer grew up in Houston and then lived four years in Dallas before spending the last decade in Austin.

“From my perspective, Austin appears less diverse and more segregated than the other two — though that is visibly changing,” he said.

So what does one do if they’re trying to boost diversity in a city that is not known for its diversity?

For Preston James, it was to help start DivInc — a nonprofit that aims to bridge the gap between underrepresented entrepreneurs and the resources they need to build profitable, high-growth companies — in 2016.

Today, he notes, Austin is home to an “insane talent pool” and several new emerging funds exclusively focused on Black, Latinx and women founders, including BEAM, The Fund, New Type Ventures, Agave Fund, Silicon Hills Capital and True Wealth Ventures (which was considered the first of its kind in the city).

While James is excited about all the venture activity taking place, he wonders how much is going to underrepresented founders and women.

“We have to be proud enough in our achievements to also acknowledge where we’re still falling short too, especially for underestimated founders,” James said.

Still, he believes that while Austin still has “a long way to go in improving diversity,” there are rarely quick fixes to historically systemic racial and gender equity issues in our society.

Some ways to help move things along, in James’ view, are for existing funds to be willing to fund “a lot more diverse founders early — often and equitably at the pre-seed and Series A stages.”

He also thinks the city needs to be home to more emerging funds focused on investing in underestimated founders.

“This will help build the pipeline of unicorn companies with diverse founders. In addition, these emerging funds will also create a pipeline of potential diverse VC partners for traditional VC firms,” James said.

He also believes all the Big Tech companies could be doing more with their environmental, social and governance (ESG) initiatives, such as making more grant investments with a special focus on supporting underrepresented founded companies and organizations like DivInc “that provide strong programming and support systems for them.”

Sam Haytham, founder of Austin startup Kiro Action, says he is painfully aware of the lack of “brown and Black” diversity in the startup scene. Haytham is not currently seeking venture money but when he does, he expects it to be a more difficult process than that of many of his counterparts.

“I think the opportunities for diverse founders are very limited,” he told TechCrunch. “When you look at VC groups, they’re very male and very white. And if you want to get funded, and are white and male, you can get funded even before you have an idea.”

“Meanwhile, diverse founders are literally sitting there scratching to get every little bit to push their product to market. It’s even more difficult for minority and women founders with the funding systems in place,” he added.

For now, Kiro Action — a recent SXSW pitch winner —  is self-funded and focused on addressing two of the biggest problems that Austin faces: homelessness and affordable housing.

“Our true business is social good, where the housing can be used for general/veteran homelessness, sheltering refugees and migrant farm worker housing,” Haytham said. “The same product can be used to fill multiple social good and consumer needs, ​​including crisis response housing for insurance companies, pop-up hotels and backyard flex space for consumers.”

Maria Miller, co-founder and COO of venture-backed Spot, moved to Austin after commuting between New York and Dallas.

“I found Austin to be a great balance of art, entrepreneurship and people,” she said. Miller co-founded Spot Insurance, a health insurance tech startup, in 2017. The startup offers injury insurance to protect against unexpected medical expenses, has raised over $23 million in venture funding and is on track for 500% growth this year, according to Miller.

To Miller, the lack of diversity that may exist in Austin is not exclusive to the city and has not taken away from the support she has received as a founder.

“I believe there is a lack of minority and women founders everywhere,” she told TechCrunch. “Our founder community in Austin is incredibly supportive, everyone always willing to make an introduction to talent or investors, sharing the ups and downs and allowing a level of vulnerability I haven’t experienced elsewhere.”

“Click here for Austin city spotlight