Stop Hacking Your Success — Start Building

The word “hack” has a colorful history. Not so long ago, if someone had suggested you had hacked your way to the top, you probably would have given them a sideways glance. The word described someone who performed mediocre work — not someone to emulate.

Now, “hack” has a different meaning — to take a shortcut around an otherwise far-reaching goal. For founders of startups and emerging companies, the idea of a quick hack can be intriguing. Who would not want to pursue a potential workaround to help gain traction fast?

Yes, some companies have used “growth hacks” to their advantage. But every company and situation are unique. A hack that works well for one may be detrimental for another — maybe even yours.

I believe that hacking will always be about aimless rough cuts that sometimes work, but more often miss the mark. 

But there is an even bigger issue – hacking often comes at the expense of building. Just as you cannot build a strong house out of an odd stack of firewood, you cannot build a strong business through hacks alone.

Too many people think they can leapfrog over the hard work of building and land right on success through a few swift chops. They do not realize that creating something solid and lasting — not something precarious and quickly cobbled together — takes work.

To build a successful career and company, you must have:

It may be easy to picture your success at the end, but not as easy to visualize the steps to get there. Begin with a strong sense of purpose — knowing the goal you want to accomplish and developing a clear strategy to reach it. Starting with strategy is a strong foundation from which to grow. But there is no quick hack for that kind of hard work.

Everyone loves a good tale, but stories of startups hacking their way to success are a distraction. Do not allow yourself to be wooed by seductive shortcuts. If you want to build something that endures, tune out the noise and hyper-focus on the fundamentals — not quick-fix hackery that may be here today, gone tomorrow.

You can try out hacks that wind up being a monumental waste of your time and effort — and a major detour from your goals. Remember that every decision must tie into your long-term vision. Do your best to plan to minimize mistakes and avoid wasting time. Otherwise, you may lose any momentum that you worked hard to gain.

Achievement takes serious effort  — and the sobering realization that the stakes are high. What appears to be a timesaver today may put the successful realization of your plan in jeopardy. All of that effort is meaningless if you choose the quickest route and fail to execute on your plan.

Today, hacks are seen as a good thing. But tomorrow, who knows? I do know that if you start with a goal and concentrate on building you will stand a better chance of outlasting the hacks.

When others tell the story of your success, you hope they will remember the effort you poured into building something solid and enduring. Not how you nearly made your mark with some fantastic gimmicks before fizzling out altogether.

Have you benefited from hacking or building?

Periscope Producer lets you stream to Twitter from pro cameras, apps, VR

periscope-producer Periscope is embracing professional streaming and expanding beyond amateur content shot on phones with its new Periscope Producer feature. It allows creators to generate a special URL that they can then stream to from a wide array of devices, including professional cameras, studio editing rigs, satellite trucks, desktop streaming software like OBS, games, VR headsets, drones and later,… Read More

Nokia’s Ozo Creator VR software arrives on Windows

Nokia Ozo When the Nokia Ozo launched late last year, it was clear that the virtual reality camera didn’t have everything figured out. The key, according to Nokia’s Head of Presence Capture Guido Voltolina, was just getting the camera out there. Since then the team at Ozo has been consistently upgrading the feature set of the camera through firmware and software updates, and now the… Read More

Ricoh adds a mid-range 360-degree camera

group-shot-theta-sc-800x420 You likely haven’t been convinced that you need a 360-degree camera in your life yet. And honestly, Ricoh’s new product probably isn’t going to tip anyone over the edge. The Theta SC isn’t designed to revolutionize the space so much as it is designed to help mainstream it, offering up a mid-tier for the company’s line. Mid-tier in 360-degree camera land means… Read More

Google Photos can now turn videos into GIFs, fix sideways photos & more

google-photos2 Google Photos was already one of the smartest cloud photo services available today, thanks to its search technology and built-in assistant that automatically creates collages, animations and more from your uploads. Now, the company is upgrading its service again, with a bevy of new features aimed at helping you revisit your memories and generally better enjoy your photos. This update… Read More

Help! I’ve Been Handed a Bad Product Strategy

On our blog we often discuss the challenges of being a product manager. One recurring theme is that although you are ultimately responsible for the success or failure of your products, you often do not have organizational authority over anyone.

It’s a conundrum: Your job is to develop a consensus and execute your product’s strategic plan without the authority to tell anyone what to do. You need to bring together development, marketing, sales, and even your executives to make that plan a reality. This is why we frequently make the case that successful product management is largely a function of leadership — not management (at least in the sense of ordering and supervising). It’s also why my team here at ProductPlan has written several posts, like this one, about the need for product managers to learn how to think strategically, communicate persuasively, evangelize for their products, and develop other important soft skills.

Tweet This:
“Product management is largely a function of leadership — not management.”

But what happens when the product management challenge you face is that you have poor strategic direction to begin with?

In other words, what if you’re simply handed an ever-changing strategy and given responsibility for turning it into a successful product? Worse, what if you know that the product strategy is flawed or poorly conceived?

This happens all too often. And it happened to a product manager who attended a recent webinar on thought leadership that I presented for Pragmatic Marketing. I’ve reproduced a portion of the message here. Then I’ll summarize the advice I gave him, because I think it could prove useful for you, if you ever find yourself in a similar situation.

Hi Jim,

I have a question about working with a poor product strategy for a just launched product. Our ex-CXO developed the product strategy. Since his departure, the executive team doesn’t have the resources or energy to fix the problems he left, and I find it difficult to push out the releases and spend time on defining a new product strategy. Unsurprisingly, there has been weak adoption of the product by the market and few new users.

How do you deal with being handed a poor product strategy where the targeted customer segment isn’t clear, not enough time was spent learning about the potential users, and your executives don’t want to stop product development and do customer development in order to hone in on a specific segment, learn more about pain points and get super clear of value add?

How You Can Get Stuck with a Poor Product Strategy

poor product strategy

As I told this attendee, this is an excellent question, because it summarizes so many of the challenges product managers and product owners face when their company’s ideas and assumptions don’t match reality.

Here are the challenges — every one of them a common problem, facing many companies, particularly startups — that I spotted in his question.

Software companies want to deliver new features.

This is understandable, because it shows progress. It’s also an easy metric to focus on and can feel like an easy win. “Look! We’re releasing new features to the market!”

The more important question, though, is whether any of these new features will move the needle for the company in terms of user adoption, opening new markets, customer delight, and positive public reviews.

Executives work on assumptions — not always grounded in fact.

Another common product management challenge, clearly evident from this attendee’s message, is that often a startup’s executive team will be working off of their own assumptions about their market, their product, their competitors and their target customers.

This, too, is understandable. After all, the executives were responsible for getting the company off the ground, and as a result they have probably developed a bias in favor of their own opinions.

At the attendee’s company, the previous product lead was clearly operating on his own assumptions. But as the product release revealed, he likely didn’t subject those assumptions to testing and verification before building them into his strategy.

Growing companies often feel the need to keep their developers busy.

The note in this message about the executive team not wanting to stop product development to focus on strategy highlights another common product management challenge. Often a management team or a company’s investor will equate a development team being busy — being “productive” — with the company making progress.

Again, that’s understandable from the standpoint that the company is paying for development resources, and the perception is that those resources will be sitting idle while the product team interviews customers, studies the market and conducts other “fuzzy” tasks. It certainly isn’t as easy to measure as hammering out code.

Tweet This:
“Focusing on strategy is far more valuable than just keeping the dev team busy.”

But as smart product owners like this attendee understand, focusing on strategy is far more valuable than keeping a development team busy on the wrong things.

Product owners can become information silos.

One final problem that this attendee’s message highlighted is that often a company’s product owner — whether a product manager, VP, or founder — can become the organization’s perceived source of knowledge about the product, market, competitive landscape and customer personas.

This is obviously a danger. If the rest of the product team has little to no input in developing the product strategy, the departure of one key individual can leave the company struggling to figure out all of the learnings and input that went into building that strategy.

The good news, as I told this attendee, is that a product owner can indeed improve upon a flawed or poorly conceived product strategy. Here are the suggestions I offered to him.

How to Fix a Poor Product Strategy

fix bad product strategy

1. Assign a product owner (or team) to drive the strategy.

One key component to creating a viable product strategy is to assign a responsible person or team to the task. In other words, developing the product strategy needs to be a clearly defined role in the company.

If it becomes an informal, widely distributed task that everyone has a hand in crafting, your product strategy likely will be watered down.

Ideally, this will be a product manager, as I suggested to the attendee. But it could also be another product owner or even a small dedicated group of product team members.

2. The product strategist must then bring evidence supporting these strategic initiatives.

If you want to improve a weak product strategy, you must first identify a few of the major strategic initiatives that will support your vision. These initiatives should emerge after working closely with customers (end users, economic buyers at your customers’ organizations, etc.) to determine the problems they’re facing and how your product can solve those problems.

From there, you will be able to present real evidence to your stakeholders that these strategic initiatives support solutions that your customers need and are willing to pay for.

This means shifting the focus of your efforts from developing more product features to performing customer development — getting out there and talking with a cross-section of your customers and potential customers. What I suggested to my attendee, and what I’d also invite your team to do, would be to spend time on the road visiting with customers to identify the ideal segment, and to settle on a few of the most compelling problems to solve for that segment.

Tweet This:
“Handed a poor product strategy? Shift the focus back to customer development.”

A related part of your research here, of course, would be to validate that your target customers would be willing to buy your solution if it were to solve these major problems for their companies.

3. The product strategist should get company buy-in to shift focus temporarily from project management to crafting the new strategy.

Through customer development you can prioritize your strategic initiatives. You can use a variety of methods to prioritize before developing your visual product roadmap. This roadmap will serve as your high-level blueprint for implementing your product strategy.

You and your team will need to step back temporarily from a focus on your backlog. Instead, you will need to focus on customer problems, describing how your product will help solve those problems, and putting this into a strategic plan.

As part of this process, you will need to communicate this plan to your executive team to earn their buy-in.

If you work at a smaller company you might also need to offload some of your day-to-day project management responsibilities so that you can focus on strategy. This might be more challenging, and you might receive pushback.

But if you’re going to avoid the problem my attendee faced — releasing an unsuccessful product because you were forced to work from a poor strategy — it will be worth convincing your stakeholders to give you this strategy time. It will pay big dividends on release day and beyond.

Have other ideas for handling a flawed product strategy? Please share them with us in the comments section.

The post Help! I’ve Been Handed a Bad Product Strategy appeared first on .

Hands on with Hover’s self-flying camera drone, which launches today

img_0334 A year or so ago a new type of drone hit the (preorder) market. It was the self-flying camera drone – a device that promised to combine camera and AI technology to create a drone that you could essentially throw in the air to follow you around and take photos and videos. Some of these drones include Snap, Lily, Staaker and Hover. Most of these companies have raised tens of millions… Read More

Thrillist, NowThis, The Dodo and Seeker form a new, Discovery-backed holding company

Ben Lerer Four digital media organizations are coming together to form a new holding company — and they’ve also raised $100 million in additional funding from Discovery Communications. Those four companies are Thrillist (lifestyle), NowThis Media (video news), The Dodo (animals) and Discovery’s digital network Seeker (including its production studio SourceFed). Thrillist’s Ben… Read More